Her therapist suggests confrontation therapy which triggers her connection to Alessa. In ongoing therapy shes upset and frustrated with the lack of progress shes making and thinks she will never be 'whole/real' person again. The way she acted just did not seem real, just seemed like a really bad portrayal of a teenage girl (for some reason there always grumpy introverts who act like badasses?). They discover people are being drawn to silent hill and going missing. Sharon (or Heather? I guess?) was particularly boring.
The monsters were much scarier than her, especially that freaky mannequin doll monster. Alessa in the second movie did not excite me at all, there were no scary elements to her. She just looks like a misunderstood emo kid. In the second movie, Alessa is all grown up. I liked the idea of having evil possessed children, because let's admit, that's some creepy sh*t. In the original Silent Hill, I found all the characters to be original in their own ways. Return to a place of insanity and blood-curdling chills in this shocking sequel to one of the most surreal and gruesome horror films ever created. Sometimes characters need to be cut off in order to make a movie great.
We all have character preferences when it comes to movies, which can lead to feelings of disappointment if a remake comes out without your favourite character. Heather Mason (Adelaide Clemens) and her father (Sean Bean) have always tried to stay one step ahead of the malevolent forces intent on their destruction.
